![]() The single-core performance is great as well, with the new iMacs occupying the top spots in our Mac Benchmark chart, but I don’t think the increase is enough to justify upgrading from a 2017 iMac. Conclusionįor users with multi-core aware applications, the new iMacs provide a significant boost in multi-core performance, with the new 8-core 27-inch iMac providing a compelling alternative to the 8- and 10-core iMac Pro. For example, the 8-core iMac has 16% higher single-core performance and 10% lower multi-core performance than the 10-core iMac Pro. The new 6- and 8-core iMac is even competitive with the 8- and 10-core iMac Pro. Again, the increase is due to higher frequencies and core counts, not to any architectural improvements. Multi-core performance is up 43-49% for the 6-core models, and up 66% for the 8-core models. iMac (27-inch) Performanceįor the new 27-inch iMac, single-core performance is up 6-11%. Since the processor architecture is effectively unchanged between the 7th generation and the 8th generation Intel Core processors, most of the increase is due to higher frequencies and higher core counts. To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 6 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. ![]() I expect its performance will be comparable to the Mac mini with an i7 processor as their processors have the same number of cores and frequencies.įor the new 21.5-inch iMac with i3 and i5 processors, single-core performance is up 5-10%, and multi-core performance is up 10-50%. Welcome to the Geekbench Metal Benchmark Chart. There are currently no results for the new 21.5-inch iMac with an i7 processor. Higher scores are better, with double the score indicating double the performance. These scores are the average of 418 user results uploaded to the. The MacBook Pro (15-inch Mid 2017) with an Intel Core i7-7920HQ processor scores 1,180 for single-core performance and 3,750 for multi-core performance in the Geekbench 6 CPU Benchmark. Let’s take a quick look at the performance of the new iMacs using Geekbench 4 results from the Geekbench Browser.įor those unfamiliar with Geekbench 4, it is our cross-platform CPU and GPU benchmark. The MacBook Pro (15-inch Mid 2017) is a Mac laptop with an Intel Core i7-7920HQ processor. For comparison, the M1 Max chip in the Mac Studio scored 1,755 in single-core and 12,333 in multi. We should be seeing additional M1 Max and M1 Pro Geekbench results in the coming days as the new MacBook Pro models are expected to arrive to customers next Tuesday and media review units will be going out even sooner than that.Apple announced updated 21.5-inch and 27-inch iMacs last week. According to the test, the M2 Max chip scored 1,853 in single-core and 13,855 in multi-core. He initially said there was an issue with the frequency estimation, but he believes that this is an issue with Geekbench and not the processor. The machine with the chip in question is running macOS 12.4, which we have seen in our analytics, and Geekbench's John Poole believes the result is legitimate. The 11542 multi-core score is on par with the late 2019 Mac Pro that is equipped with a 12-core Intel Xeon W-3235. ![]() The chip features a single-core score of 1749 and a multi-core score of 11542, which offers double the multi-core performance of the M1 chip that's in the 13-inch MacBook Pro machine.īased on these numbers, the M1 Max outperforms all Mac chips with the exception of the Mac Pro and iMac models equipped with Intel's high-end 16 to 24-core Xeon chips. Just after Apple's event introducing the new MacBook Pro models with M1 Pro and M1 Max chips, the first benchmark for the high-end M1 Max chip with 10-core CPU and 32-core GPU appears to have surfaced. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |